What is meant by "personal impact and articulation skills" in the context of border entry?
Within dozens of highly-rated responses regarding both UK and Schengen entry, I see the phrase "personal impact and articulation skills."
There is no further explanation of what these mean and, in many circumstances, appear to be important, or vital, to successful outcomes. Can these be defined, quantified, expanded, and exemplified?
For the most part, the queries originate from those who don't require an entry clearance, many from US and Australian citizens, although not exclusively.
Tymoteusz Paul suggested that, in requesting temporary admission:
More than any other factor, the outcome of an event with a British Immigration Officer is influenced by personal impact and articulation skills.
Joel Damien explained to the student whose visa was expiring and wished to leave and re-enter as a tourist
This is entirely up to the Immigration Officer who lands you (if he does in fact land you). For both cases you will need a convincing reason why you are showing up after your course of study has ended. You can expect to be asked this question during your landing interview and the outcome will depend upon the plausibility of your answer along with your personal impact and articulation skills.
And Gayot Fow's guidance to a non-EU citizen who works in Germany but still has a valid UK residence permit and ask if he may enter using it:
Depending upon your nationality and other soft factors (personal impact and articulation skills) you may be successful with that.
The author of many answers, whom I queried, recommended opening the discussion among all TSE users, toward broader understanding and content when such terminology is used.
Personal impact: what is it, how is it accomplished, what are the positive and negative traits?
Articulation skills: what does that mean, what are better or worse, what traits are preferable or more successful?
Best Answer
Personal impact refers to how a traveler presents him- or herself to an immigration officer. Some people may appear more credible, while others may seem less so. Some people may appear nervous, others confident. Some people may appear to be aggressive or demanding, while others may be cooperative.
The traveler's appearance and demeanor have an impact on the officers who are judging whether to admit them to the country. In some respects, this may be unfortunate, because it invokes the specter of discrimination based on things like appearance. On the other hand, an immigration officer's job is to judge people, mostly in a very short time, to determine whether they meet the criteria for admission. One way of judging people is on the basis of their personal impact, and a person's credibility is certainly something they can and should question if they have a reason to do so.
Articulation denotes a person's ability to express a position. In this case, articulation skills come into play when a traveler is asked to explain the purpose of his or her visit. The more coherent the explanation, the more likely it is to meet with success. Similarly, if an immigration officer misunderstands some evidence presented at the border, such as a bank statement, it will be necessary to articulate the nature of the misunderstanding.
For example, suppose a traveler brings her university diploma with her, and this is discovered during a search of her bags, leading an immigration officer to suspect that she has arrived to look for work. If she has an alternative explanation for bringing the diploma, she may satisfy the officer. The success of that explanation will depend in part on her articulation skills.
Pictures about "What is meant by "personal impact and articulation skills" in the context of border entry?"
COMMUNICATION SKILLS Interview Questions and Answers! (PASS Competency-Based Interviews!)
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Allan Mas, Brett Sayles, Brett Sayles, Brett Sayles