What's the point of biometric passports if they're accepted even if the chip fails?
Biometric passports supposedly increase the level of passport security by including a digital (cryptographically signed?) copy of the passport, along with the owner's fingerprints. However it seems that such passports are accepted even if the chip fails. Moreover the situation seems common enough that a failed chip doesn't (usually) cause any secondary checks to verify the passport's authenticity.
In that case, what's the point of introducing biometric passports in the first place? Wouldn't it make sense to ban biometric documents where the "electronic" part could not be verified?
Pictures about "What's the point of biometric passports if they're accepted even if the chip fails?"
Are all UK passports biometric?
All passports issued in the UK are now biometric. A biometric passport is also known as an electronic passport or ePassport.Do you need fingerprint for passport?
At the centre, you will also need to submit your fingerprints and photograph. This is known as biometric information collection. A digital finger scanner collects images of at least 4 fingers, and you will have a digital photo taken.Are US passports biometric or machine readable?
US Government Passport As of August 2007, all passports issued by the Government Publishing Office for the United States Department of State are biometric passports.When did biometric passports start in UK?
First issued in the UK in 2010, biometric passports add a number of new security features to the traditional passport, with an embedded microchip containing the holder's personal information. Holders of a biometric passport can also use the ePassport gates at border control for faster entry into the UK.Rnbstylerz \u0026 AREES - WHAT
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Rachel Claire, Enoch Patro, Tom Fisk, Rachel Claire