Is a 2-hour connection time enough in Atlanta?
We recently travelled to Salt Lake City from Manchester in the U.K. via Atlanta. We are UK citizens and were travelling under the Visa Waiver Scheme + ESTA for the first time.
We had a two-hour connection in Atlanta. However, we queued in immigration for over an hour and a half, meaning we missed our connecting flight. We are now in dispute with our airline (Virgin Atlantic) about whether we are due compensation, as we don't think a two-hour connection was enough time to be sure of catching our flight.
My question is 'how typical was our experience with Immigration in Atlanta?'. I believe waiting times are much less for US citizens and for those visiting the US for the second time under ESTA. However, is 90 minutes fairly typical for someone travelling under ESTA for the first time?
Best Answer
U.S. Customs and Border Protection operates an Airport Wait Times website where you can retrieve reports about average waits at different times of the day at different airports. (Note that this is for CBP processing, not TSA security screening, which has a different website).
At Terminal F at ATL for this past Monday, for example, the worst non-citizen maximum wait times were reportedly from 0500-0600, at 75 minutes, with 3 passengers (both US and non-US citizens) having to wait more than an hour. For what it's worth, that's better than 1500-1600 in Terminal E, when the max wait was 79 minutes with 88 people queued up for over an hour.
Based on your routing, I would guess you were connecting onto a Delta flight. Both ATL and SLC are Delta hubs, with flights between them departing every hour or two throughout the entire day, so I hope you were reaccommodated without too much hassle. The fact of this schedule may even have influenced the time Virgin Atlantic thought would be sufficient, especially if only a few people on the intended SLC flight are non-US nationals making international connections.
For comparison, the minimum connection time for a Delta-to-Delta international-to-domestic flight is reported by FlyerTalk as only 85 minutes which, in my experience with Atlanta, sounds optimistic to say the least.
Airlines have little interest in having their passengers miss flights, and minimum connection times are (probably) not fabricated from whole cloth. But as the saying goes, past performance is no guarantee of future results. There can be flight delays, or computer or staffing problems, or a couple of 747s may enjoy light headwinds and land just ahead of you. If arriving late will have a cascading effect on further travel, adding a little padding doesn't hurt; it's often advised that people flying in for departing cruises should plan to arrive the previous day.
Pictures about "Is a 2-hour connection time enough in Atlanta?"
Is a 2 hour layover in Atlanta enough?
...., Two hours is just about perfect. You have plenty of time with an on time arrival, and you could absorb a one hour delay and still make it.Is 2 hour connection time enough?
For international layover flights booked on one airline, two hours is often recommended to make your connection. For international flights on different airlines, the connection time will need to be even greater as you may have to change terminals between the two flights.How much time should I allow at the Atlanta airport?
Airport officials recommend passengers arrive inside at least two hours before your domestic flight is set to depart. That recommendation increases to three hours before international flights.Is 90 minutes enough for a layover in Atlanta?
It's quite easy to make it on time. Yes, I've been through ATL many times, also, especially over the last 4-5 years. 90 minutes is plenty of time to connect between flights there if your arriving flight is on time. If it's not on time, then there's a good chance you and/or your baggage will miss your connection.Flying Alone for the First Time | Connecting Flight Procedure | How to Catch a Connecting Flight
More answers regarding is a 2-hour connection time enough in Atlanta?
Answer 2
I think two hours in this case are enough, most of the time. So usually it will be fine, but occasionally someone will suffer larger than average delays, and will miss a flight. Unfortunately, this happened to be you.
I missed a flight once exactly this way, and the airline (US Airways) just put me on the next flight (which was the next hour). They didn't try to argue that it's my fault.
I'm not sure what compensation you expect. If you mean that you shouldn't pay extra for the change of flight, I think you're right. If you want compensation for the delay, I don't know.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Andrea Piacquadio, Markus Spiske, Monstera, LT Chan