Why does TSA security vary so much for different airports?
I would assume TSA (Transportation Security Administration) security to be especially tight no matter the airport, but it seems that the different airports I have been to have often very different policies.
For example, I went to OAK (Oakland International), but security was very very lax. For example, shoes stayed on the entire time, electronics did not need to be taken out of the backpacks, belts and wallets did not need to come out. No full body scanners were in place, only metal detectors and the usual bag screening.
However, IAD (Washington Dulles) and SFO (San Franciso International) were much more stringent, requiring full body scanners, shoes and metal objects going in containers, etc.
Is there a reason that these security protocols vary so widely in different airports?
To note, I flew domestic on each flight. This "data" was composed out of 3 trips leaving from OAK, then flying back. Security protocols remained the same flying
Best Answer
In a word, money. And to some extent, people.
Everything costs. Some airports have had scares in the past and will allocate more money to TSA procedures. Some changes, like the Global Entry Pass, have improved some things and will cost additional money.
Let's say the TSA has decided some new fancy scanner is the latest and greatest bomb detector. Can every airport afford to buy it? Even if the city or government pays for it (I'm not sure who does), people have to be trained to use it. And some of that technology is pretty modern - no longer are we checking people's bags for water bottles, it's now determining whether power packs for charging cellphones might or might not be potentially explosive batteries. When SSD harddrives became mainstream, iyt required more training as staff had been told to look for moving parts in laptops' harddrives, and now there aren't any.
There's also limits in staff numbers - they all cost. So at certain times at certain airports you're far more likely to be selected for gunpowder residue screening. Why? The guy's job is to check a person, and when that's done, look up and pick the next person. At peak times, 50 people may have walked past him in that time. He can't check them all. However at quieter times, or in a smaller airport, the traffic of passengers is lower and he can check a greater percentage.
Same applies with drug/fruit-sniffing dogs. They get tired, require training, and can only be on the floor for a given period of time and check a limited number of bags.
So in a few words perhaps: money, time, and people.
Pictures about "Why does TSA security vary so much for different airports?"
Are random TSA checks random?
The security personnel at the gate do not use a random number generator to select passengers to check. Rather, they stand by the gate and approach people. Now, the last couple of occasions they have chosen me, I've asked them what criteria they used, and both times I was told it was random.What is the failure rate of the TSA?
During the test, TSA officers missed 67 of the 70 fake weapons that went through the checks \u2014 a failure rate of 95%.Will Clear expand to more airports?
For Clear, this is just its latest location in the midst of rapid expansion in recent years to more airports, rental car facilities, sports and entertainment venues, and even into the COVID-19 vaccination and testing verification realm.How accurate is TSA?
The result was that "TSA agents failed 67 out of 70 tests, with Red Team members repeatedly able to get potential weapons through checkpoints." Two years later, a Red Team test at Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport achieved the same 95 percent failure rate to detect explosives, weapons, and illegal drugs.Why Airport Security Is So Bad In The U.S.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Matthew Turner, Plato Terentev, PhotoMIX Company, Pixabay