Why do airports, not airlines, determine what can be taken on board?

Why do airports, not airlines, determine what can be taken on board? - Active young male skateboarder riding skateboard on asphalt ramp

I asked an airline if I could carry peanut butter with me in my hand luggage, and the airline asked me to contact the airport at which I was to board. This doesn't make sense to me. Shouldn't it be a standard for an airline rather than an airport? Better, it should be a standard for all airlines and airports.



Best Answer

The people who make the decision are not employed by the airline. They are employed by the airport, or by the government of the country in which the airport is located. It is not possible for one airline to decide it's ok for you to bring peanut butter and another to decide you can't, then try to instruct the security inspectors accordingly.

There are some matters that airlines decide for themselves, such as accepting sports equipment (surfboards) and the like as checked luggage. They also typically set the size and weight limits for your hand luggage. They can ban things on their own account, but they can't unban things that the security agency has banned. That is simply out of the airline's hands. It's probably not the airport who decides, but the airport will have a copy of the rules, or will know who to refer you to next.

You will never see a standard for all airports, btw. Domestic flights in many small countries have literally no security inspection at all. I flew on planes where a passenger was carrying a machete wrapped up in newspaper. It wasn't even in a bag! That works for small places where domestic flights are unlikely terrorism targets.




Pictures about "Why do airports, not airlines, determine what can be taken on board?"

Why do airports, not airlines, determine what can be taken on board? - From above of anonymous young sportsman performing stunt on skateboard on asphalt ramp during outdoor training on sunny day
Why do airports, not airlines, determine what can be taken on board? - Crop anonymous male skater wearing white shorts riding skateboard on asphalt ramp in skate park on summer sunny day
Why do airports, not airlines, determine what can be taken on board? - Active black skater performing tricks on ramp in skate park



What can I take on board aircraft?

What can and what cannot be taken on board?Itemhand baggageregistered baggageMP3 players, Walkmans, DVD and CD playersYESYESHair straighteners, hair dryers, hair curlers and wandsYESYESTattoo equipmentNOYESTravel ironYESYES12 more rows•Jun 25, 2019

What happens in an airport if your checked in baggage has something that is prohibited?

What happens in an airport if your checked in baggage has something that is prohibited? If the police or security service find dangerous or prohibited items in your bag, they will remove the items from the baggage.

What is not allowed on a plane carry-on?

Here's what you can't pack in your carry on: Liquids, gels, or pastes in bottles larger than 3.4 ounces (100 ml) Guns and ammunition (including BB guns and cap guns) Stun guns and tasers.

Does the airport check everything?

It is critical to the safety of all who fly that hold luggage, hand luggage and each passenger's physical person are all checked by scanners to ensure compliance with restrictions.



Why US Airports Are So Bad




More answers regarding why do airports, not airlines, determine what can be taken on board?

Answer 2

In the US, airlines don't set the transportation security guidelines and decide what can or cannot be brought in luggage or carry on. That is the job of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

TSA publishes that up to 3.4oz (100ml) are allowed in carry on: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/whatcanibring/items/peanut-butter

The reasoning behind what items and/or amounts are allowed/disallowed usually is not shared outside the agency except in obvious cases. I would guess that it is feasible to hide a sharp object or small explosive in a jar of peanut butter.

Governments are in the best position to know what attackers attempt, and set policies and communicate out to their agents. If airlines were to hold responsibility for setting and enforcing policies like this, they would become targets to receive the customer displeasure when items are not allowed/confiscated and would set rules keeping customer displeasure in mind and erring on the side of pleasing customers.

By airlines not holding that responsibility, the airlines can correctly claim "Sorry, I understand the frustration but we don't make the rules" and direct displeasure to the TSA.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Budgeron Bach, Budgeron Bach, Budgeron Bach, Budgeron Bach