Market economy: Why air is cheaper than train? [closed]

Market economy: Why air is cheaper than train? [closed] - Bitcoins and U.s Dollar Bills

Opposedly to public misconception, most of the energy is wasted not because of acceleration but because of resistance. And, despite the airplanes are extremely airflow-shaped, the laws of physics say that environment resistance grows as square low with speed, resistance ~ v^2. So, at very high speeds, resistance is pretty high anyway. Furthermore, once head penetrates the air in front of the vehicle, the long tail experiences no resistance. So, in my opinion, very long trains transport thousands of people for free, without spending additional energy. In total, they must waste 100 times less energy than airplane. Nevertheless, when I look at the prices, I start to see the opposite. E.g. Berlin-Geneva train costs at least 250 euros, the flight tickets start at less than 100. So, the market economy accounts the trains as resource wasters. Why?






Pictures about "Market economy: Why air is cheaper than train? [closed]"

Market economy: Why air is cheaper than train? [closed] - Round Silver and Gold Coins
Market economy: Why air is cheaper than train? [closed] - 100 Us Dollar Banknotes
Market economy: Why air is cheaper than train? [closed] - Pile of American paper money on black surface



Why is it cheaper to fly than take the train?

Trains are more expensive than planes because the aviation industry is one of the most undertaxed and overly subsidised sections of the UK economy. There's no VAT on plane tickets, and there's no tax on aviation fuel, despite road fuels like petrol and diesel being taxed at 57.95p per litre, plus 20% in VAT.

Is it cheaper to fly or take the train?

Train travel is often cheaper than flying (especially since you can take more with you before paying extra baggage fees). And it can be more convenient than driving \u2014 especially if you'd be driving in an unfamiliar place or having to drive for hours and hours nonstop to get to your destination.

Is it better to fly or take the train?

But when you factor in total travel time, flying actually takes about 14 minutes longer one way: 3 hours and 38 minutes for the train and 3 hours and 52 minutes for the plane. The train also wins when it comes to cost: $188 on Amtrak6 and $291 on the airlines.

Why Trains are better than planes?

Trains offer greater flexibility at each stage of the journey, making family train travel easier and less stressful than flying. Children can move around more freely than on a plane, and you'll have the space to pack home comforts.



Maeklong railway market Bangkok, thailand | what happened when train is coming? - shockwave




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: David McBee, David McBee, John Guccione www.advergroup.com, Karolina Grabowska