Explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA [closed]

Explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA [closed] - Low angle of road sign with Route 66 End of the Trail inscription located near fast food restaurant against cloudy evening sky on Santa Monica Beach

I have plenty of direct flights from my city to the US, however on one occasion I took a connecting flight via Amsterdam, purely for the fun of flying. It was not cheaper than a direct flight. Once in Amsterdam I was questioned about my choice before boarding the flight, I was told to show evidence of a return flight, they also wanted to see ties to my departure country, they wanted to know why I'm flying at that particular time, and once they were satisfied, they waved me through. I believe that all passengers were questioned, but I don't know if they were questioned to the same extent.

Is there anything I need to be aware of with this approach? I feel that, when questioned, they won't be satisfied if I'm telling them I'm doing this for entertainment - particularly if the layover is too short to be able to leave the airport and explore.

Maybe relevant, maybe not, but this was less than two weeks after President Trump's original Travel Ban. I did not however have any connections with any of the countries in the ban.



Best Answer

Just be honest.

Whatever you do, don't lie. Don't make up a "more reasonable" story, don't say that the ticket was cheaper if it clearly wasn't, etc. If you're doing it just for fun, just say so. It may catch their attention and you will likely have to answer a few related questions, but as long as the story is true, its your best bet. Taking a detour for fun is probably not correlated with being an overstay risk; lying about anything is (and can easily get you banned for life).

Border officers (and airline staff trying to estimate what the border guard will think) try hard to uncover the slightest inconsistencies in your story, so that they can catch you lying. The safest way to avoid being caught lying is not to lie at all.




Pictures about "Explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA [closed]"

Explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA [closed] - Empty asphalt road going through cactus fields towards rocky mountains against cloudy blue sky in United States of America
Explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA [closed] - Body of Water Surrounded by Mountains
Explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA [closed] - Focused young man pointing at map while searching for route with multiracial friends in Grand Central Terminal during trip in New York





The Places Where Sneaking Over the US-Canada Border is Legal




More answers regarding explaining alternative travel routes when going to the USA [closed]

Answer 2

I would like to expand on the hard rule "do not lie at an airport" and add a companion rule "never furnish information unasked". Both for security and immigration always answer politely, factually, to the point but never drag out, pad, whatever you call it.

Also, never make up these elaborate fantasies on what security / border guard might think. You most certainly lack the training to even come close. Spending a transoceanic flight making up stories to present at immigration at the landing point is a recipe for disaster. If you think "your case is special" it almost certainly isn't. (This site is a good resource for both side of the coin: both showing how many cases are not special and then what it takes for you to be special, for example this I don't know my nationality. How can I visit Denmark? insanity)

I feel that, when questioned, they won't be satisfied if I'm telling them I'm doing this for entertainment

See, this is the fantasy you are spinning. There are no reasons they wouldn't be satisfied, there are blogs, vlogs and more literally titled 'flying is fun'. And even if they are not, the totality of your circumstances will decide what happens. Lying to agents trained to catch lies, however, that never leads to anything good.

Answer 3

Is there anything I need to be aware of with this approach?

Not really. This was probably just a routine control and you got unlucky. Most likely this was a doc check executed by the airline, as the Schengen exit (if you needed one) really wouldn't care. However, the US heavily fines any airline that brings a passenger who gets denied entry, so they are motivated to be extra thorough when checking US entry requirements.

Taking stopover flights is perfectly normal and very common. In most cases it's substantially cheaper than non-stop flights. For example AMS->BOS is much more expensive than DUS->AMS->BOS, because of "revenue optimization" airline pricing. An answer like "this was the best fit for my schedule and budget" should be more than enough.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Enric Cruz López, Enric Cruz López, Pixabay, William Fortunato